
HAMDEN, Conn. – What was supposed to be a panel discussion of the media’s coverage of the 2008 presidential election Wednesday night turned into something more resembling a Barack Obama rally.
The panel was composed of five regional media members, including Les Payne (former Newsday associate editor), Juan Gonzalez (New York Daily News columnist), Lisa Burns (Associate Professor of Media Studies at Quinnipiac University), and Eric Burns (former host of “Fox News Watch”). The event was held in Quinnipiac University’s Alumni Hall and drew approximately 500 attendees, largely school students, faculty and area locals.
“It wasn’t as much about the campaign as it was about issues that surround it…race, gender, age,” said David Donnelly, Dean of the School of Communications. Donnelly added, “when you’re talking about race, you probably won’t spend a lot of time talking about McCain.”
Donnelly’s point might explain why much of the discussion focused on Obama’s candidacy and its place in history. The discussion was even entitled “History in the Making: Covering the 2008 Presidential Election.”
The New Yorker’s recent cartoon depicting Barack and Michele Obama in extremist garb served as the backdrop for much of the night, intermittently projected onto a large screen above and behind the panel’s heads. Its indistinguishable status as either racist, satirical, or both, reflected the trouble in dealing with the complex issues at play in the election.
“I think race is being avoided because it’s difficult to talk about,” said Burns. “When someone does talk about it, they have to worry about coming under attack.”
Burns’ last comment was oddly prescient, as the panel did come under fire for displaying a sensitivity towards Obama. When a student asked about their apparent bias during the concluding Q-and-A session, moderator Stan Simpson (Hartford Courant columnist and host of WTIC’s “NewsTalk 1080”) assumed responsibility, saying he composed the panel.
At the end of the event, Simpson felt a poll was in order and asked the audience to vote by raising their hands.
“How many are going to vote in the upcoming election?” All hands rose enthusiastically.
“How many are going to vote for Barack Obama?” About half the hands rose with vigor.
“And how many are going to vote for John McCain?” About twenty hands went up, most sheepishly and only half way.
The vote reflected the difficulties of having a truly dialogic exchange in an academic setting between media professionals and students and in a typically liberal state.
Republican voices were heard only a few times throughout the night and, even then, presented in a joking or negative way. Two separate video clips were shown, one depicting Governor Sarah Palin’s appearance on Saturday Night Live, and the other showing an impassioned, bigoted Midwestern gathering of Republicans condemning Obama as a terrorist.
Age and gender, two of the three issues scheduled to get equal attention, also got short shrift. Both were touched on briefly, but were dwarfed by the intensity of the racial discussion and its relation to Senator Obama’s campaign.
Not everyone felt the panel was biased, however.
“I think [the panel] had definite opinions,” said Betty Wolf, a Hamden resident, “but I don’t think they were bias, since bias usually means negative.”
Wolf’s point was well taken, as the discussion was overwhelmingly positive. Positive, that is, if you supported Obama.
But for some, the event’s merit had nothing to do with any perceived political preference. Rather, it was enough to be having an exchange.
“The nice thing about these forums is they force us to talk about these things,” Donnelly said. “The more we talk about them, the better.”


